EROGLU: “TUKEY AND TURKISH INVESTORS HAVE AN
IMPORTANT ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
TRNC ECONOMY”
Prime Minister
Dervis Eroglu has said that the Turkish
Cypriot Side’s hand at the negotiations
table will be strengthened further with the
economic development of the Turkish Republic
of Northern Cyprus. Pointing to the
importance of economic contributions made by
Turkey and Turkish investors to the TRNC, he
said `as this support grows and the economy
improves, our hand strengthens at the
talks.’
The Prime
Minister was speaking at a press briefing
after his meeting with members of the
executive board of the Turkish
Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s
Association (TUSIAD) in Istanbul.
The Prime
Minister said that the Greek Cypriot Side
will feel the need for a settlement once the
unjust international isolation over the
Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus is
lifted.
Explaining that
the Greek Cypriot Side has always rejected
the texts of agreement on the Cyprus issue,
Eroglu said the Greek Cypriot Side’s
intransigency was encouraged further with
its unilateral EU membership.
He said that
the Union’s failure to keep the promises it
made before the 2004 referenda have weaken
the Turkish Cypriot People’s trust in the EU. The
Premier underlined the need for the EU and
the UN to take steps that could encourage
the Greek Cypriot Side towards a solution.
Pointing out
that two sides were required for finding a
settlement and both sides should have the
same determination Prime Minister said
however, while the Turkish side has this
determination it was clear that the Greek
Cypriot side lacks this will. “Therefore, a
pressure should not be exerted on Turkish
and Turkish Cypriot sides but it should be
exerted on Greek Cypriot side” he added.
Prime Minister
Eroglu went on saying that the Cyprus issue
and Turkey’s EU membership process should
not be linked.
Prime Minister
Eroglu said for faster economic development
in the TRNC the economic cooperation with
Turkish firms should be deepened.
Also speaking,
TUSIAD President Umit Boyner expressed the
view that the maintenance of peace process
in Cyprus is important for Turkey’s EU
accession process and that the solution of
the Cyprus problem is a must for a good
economy in Cyprus as a whole.
ERCAKICA: “ECHR RULING ONCE AGAIN OUTLINED
THE PARAMETERS OF A SETTLEMENT IN CYPRUS”
“LEADERS TO
MEET ON TUESDAY”
Speaking to
reporters at his weekly press briefing, the
Presidential Spokesman Hasan Ercakýca
announced that special representatives of
the two leaders will be meeting this
Thursday and Friday to prepare the ground
for next week’s meeting between their
leaders.
Ercakýca said
the negotiations aiming to find a
comprehensive solution for the Cyprus
problem will continue next week with a
meeting that will be held on Tuesday.
Reminding that
next week’s meeting between President Mehmet
Ali Talat and the Greek Cypriot leader
Demetris Christofias will focus mainly on
the chapters of economy and EU matters,
Ercakica explained that the two leaders, on
some occasions, brought back the issue of
governance and power sharing to the table.
Commenting on
the European Court of Human Right’s ruling
recognizing the TRNC Immovable Property
Commission as an effective domestic remedy,
the Presidential Spokesman has said that the
ruling was in full harmony with the Turkish
Side’s positions in the negotiations.
Describing the
ruling as a turning point for property
issue, Ercakýca said :
“The ECHR
(European Court of Human Rights) announced a
historical decision last Friday that it has
approved the Immovable Property Commission
composed in the TRNC as an effective means
of domestic remedy. The said decision of the
ECHR is not subject to appeal. This decision
is the result of the policies the Turkish
side has persistently been following on the
basis of international law and particularly
the ECHR case law since 2005. The said
decision which constitutes a corner stone in
terms of the property issue in Cyprus has
clearly revealed the solution parameters of
the problem once again
The most
important aspect of the historical decision
announced by the ECHR for the Turkish
Cypriot side is the fact that it fully
complies with the principles we have been
defending in the ongoing negotiation
process. As it is known, the Turkish Cypriot
side envisages the solution of the property
issue through compensation, exchange and
restitution, along with a comprehensive
solution. The Turkish Cypriot side also
states that these three alternatives comply
with the international law. Underlining that
more than 35 years have passed over the
initiation of the problem, the ECHR stated
that the property issue could not be
undertaken through a static manner and the
developments that has taken place during the
35-year-period should be taken into
consideration. It also acknowledges that it
is not only the former owner of a particular
property that has rights but those people
who are currently in possession of that
particular property have rights as well. The
Turkish Cypriot side will continue to
undertake the property issue on this basis
which is clearly supported by the decision
of the ECHR.
The fact that
the Greek Cypriot government has called upon
the Greek Cypriots not to apply to the
Immovable Property Commission which the ECHR
has approved as a means of effective
domestic remedy with its most recent
decision is another example of the
contradictory position employed by the Greek
Cypriot side. It is an indication of the
fact that the Greek Cypriot leadership who,
on the one hand underlines that property
right is an individual right and establishes
all its arguments at the negotiation table
within this framework but on the other
strives to stop the Greek Cypriots from
applying to the Immovable Property
Commission, is not after an effort for the
protection of individual rights as they
claim but a motive to achieve political
advantage in terms of the Cyprus problem.
The Turkish
Cypriot side has always argued that the
property issue can only be concluded through
a comprehensive solution. Upon the
announcement of this decision, we hope that
the Greek Cypriot side employs a much more
reasonable position on the issue of property
and paves the way to achieve timely progress
on this chapter as well.”